<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: S3 in Business: 6 &#8211; A slow interlude</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cardbox.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/s3-in-business-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cardbox.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/s3-in-business-6/</link>
	<description>Designing, building, selling and supporting a leading End User Database</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 01:20:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://cardbox.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/s3-in-business-6/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 03:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cardbox.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/s3-in-business-6/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>Fortunately, my university has an OC-3 to the Internet (and an OC-12 to Internet2--if only Amazon would strike up a partnership with them!), so my data transfer rate to Amazon S3 might be higher than yours. However, if the limit is on Amazon&#039;s side and the roughly 3.5Mbps upload rate you show is all I&#039;ll be able to get, my calculations show that backing up my 100GB drive (which is 95% full) will take me about two and a half days. (If I could commandeer the entire OC-3, were plugged into a gigabit Ethernet port, and Amazon could take it all, I could theoretically get my entire drive backed up in less than two hours--but I wouldn&#039;t count on that.)

Two and a half days is still a long time, and I&#039;m bound to take my laptop away with me sometime in those 60 hours and lose the connection. But, it might be acceptable with a service that automatically resumes from where it left off if the connection is disrupted--I think JungleDrive does that. In any case, once the initial data is backed up, incremental changes should create much lower data transfer times.

I wonder if this is the development that will finally result in a push for higher upload speeds to residential Internet connections...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately, my university has an OC-3 to the Internet (and an OC-12 to Internet2&#8211;if only Amazon would strike up a partnership with them!), so my data transfer rate to Amazon S3 might be higher than yours. However, if the limit is on Amazon&#8217;s side and the roughly 3.5Mbps upload rate you show is all I&#8217;ll be able to get, my calculations show that backing up my 100GB drive (which is 95% full) will take me about two and a half days. (If I could commandeer the entire OC-3, were plugged into a gigabit Ethernet port, and Amazon could take it all, I could theoretically get my entire drive backed up in less than two hours&#8211;but I wouldn&#8217;t count on that.)</p>
<p>Two and a half days is still a long time, and I&#8217;m bound to take my laptop away with me sometime in those 60 hours and lose the connection. But, it might be acceptable with a service that automatically resumes from where it left off if the connection is disrupted&#8211;I think JungleDrive does that. In any case, once the initial data is backed up, incremental changes should create much lower data transfer times.</p>
<p>I wonder if this is the development that will finally result in a push for higher upload speeds to residential Internet connections&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
